Back to articlesCryptocurrency

Bitcoin's MVRV Signal Turns Bullish

By WorldFinance Editorial Team

September 23, 202612 min readbitcoinOn-Chain DataGlassnodeMVRVBull Market
Share:
Bitcoin's MVRV Signal Turns Bullish

An on-chain indicator that's flagged only two prior turning points, in 2019 and 2023, just flashed again. Here's what Bitcoin's MVRV momentum signal actually measures, and why analysts are paying attention.

On-chain analytics firm Glassnode flagged something this week that doesn't happen often: Bitcoin's MVRV momentum oscillator crossed back above its one-year baseline, a transition that's visually and structurally similar to what happened right before the 2019 and 2023 market turns. This isn't a price prediction dressed up as data. It's a specific, well-defined indicator that's only produced a handful of comparable signals in the past several years, and each prior one marked a shift out of a depressed market phase into expansion.

Here's what the indicator actually measures, why the comparison to 2019 and 2023 holds up, and what it doesn't tell you.

What MVRV Actually Is

Start with the base metric before getting into the derivative one, because the terminology gets confusing fast. MVRV stands for Market Value to Realized Value. Market value is just Bitcoin's market cap — price times circulating supply. Realized value is different: it's the sum of the price every coin last moved at on-chain, added up across the entire supply. Instead of valuing every coin at today's price, realized cap values each coin at whatever price it was last transacted.

Divide market value by realized value and you get MVRV. When MVRV is above 1, the average holder, weighted by when they last moved their coins, is sitting on an unrealized profit. When it's below 1, the average holder is underwater. It's a simple idea that turns out to be a genuinely useful gauge of how much aggregate profit or loss is currently baked into the market.

What "MVRV Momentum" Adds

The number Glassnode actually reported on isn't raw MVRV. It's what they call the MVRV Momentum Oscillator, and it's a different calculation: MVRV divided by its own one-year moving average, minus one. A reading above zero means MVRV is currently trading above its annual trend. A reading below zero means it's trading below trend.

This distinction matters, because it's easy to conflate "MVRV momentum turned positive" with "the average holder just became profitable," and those are two different statements. Momentum turning positive doesn't require MVRV to cross any particular fixed level. It just means the ratio has moved back above where it's been averaging over the past year. That's a trend-following signal, not a profit/loss threshold.

The 2019 and 2023 Comparison

Here's why the current move is getting attention. Glassnode's own read is that the current crossover is structurally similar to the transitions seen in 2019 and 2023. In both of those prior instances, the same pattern played out: MVRV momentum stayed below its one-year baseline for an extended stretch, recovered gradually back up toward the 1.0 boundary, wobbled around that level a few times, and then eventually crossed through and held above it. Both of those historical crossovers occurred near major transitions out of depressed, contracting market conditions into subsequent expansion phases.

The current setup followed a similar path. The oscillator saw several movements around the 1.0 boundary before a more persistent deterioration developed through 2025 into 2026, eventually falling to around 0.6 — one of the deeper negative readings visible in the recent data. From there, it's recovered sharply, moving back through and slightly past 1.0 this week.

None of this is Glassnode claiming certainty about what happens next. It's a pattern-match: the shape of this recovery resembles the shape of two prior recoveries that preceded real bull phases. That's meaningfully more specific than a generic "sentiment is improving" observation, but it's still a pattern, not a guarantee.

What Else Lines Up With It

The MVRV signal isn't showing up in isolation. It's arriving alongside a broader set of data points that, taken together, paint a fairly consistent picture.

Bitcoin has broken above its 50-week moving average, a level traders watch closely as a marker of possible trend reversal. Daily RSI is sitting around 80, which technically puts short-term momentum in overbought territory — worth noting, since it means a near-term pullback or consolidation wouldn't be surprising even if the larger trend holds. The daily MACD reading is bullish. A recent trader poll put sentiment at roughly 82.5% bullish versus 17.5% bearish, which is a lopsided read, though sentiment polls tend to be a better contrarian indicator at extremes than a reliable forecasting tool on their own.

The on-chain supply data adds another layer. Long-term holders currently control around 83% of circulating Bitcoin supply, the highest share since late 2023. Only about 14% of all coins have ever moved at a price above $100,000, meaning the overwhelming majority of the supply has a cost basis well below current levels. That combination — a large share of supply held by long-term, low-cost-basis holders — is generally read as a market where dips find buyers, because the people most likely to panic-sell already did so in an earlier cycle.

Why the MVRV Level Itself Still Has Room

One more piece of context worth including: even with momentum turning positive, the underlying MVRV score itself is still sitting well below the euphoric zones that showed up at prior market peaks. That's a meaningfully different setup than what you'd see near a market top, where MVRV readings tend to be stretched to the point where even long-term holders are sitting on outsized paper gains relative to history.

Put simply, this isn't a signal firing after the move already happened. It's firing while there's still, according to Glassnode's own framing, room before the market becomes objectively stretched by historical standards. That's part of why analysts are treating this as a "check the setup" moment rather than a "the move is over" one.

Why Realized Cap Beats Market Cap for This Kind of Read

It's worth spending a minute on why analysts reach for realized cap instead of just using market cap directly, because the difference explains why MVRV is useful in the first place. Market cap treats every coin as if it were bought today, at today's price. That makes it a poor tool for judging aggregate profit or loss, because it tells you nothing about what holders actually paid.

Realized cap fixes that by anchoring each coin's value to the last time it actually moved on-chain. A coin that hasn't moved since it was mined in 2013 gets valued at whatever Bitcoin was worth back then, not at today's price. A coin that changed hands last week gets valued near current price. Sum all of that up and you get a much more accurate read on the market's actual cost basis than market cap alone provides.

That's why MVRV, and by extension its momentum oscillator, tend to line up reasonably well with real turning points historically. They're not measuring sentiment or price action directly. They're measuring something closer to the market's aggregate embedded profit or loss, which behaves differently than price alone, especially at extremes. A market can be making new highs on price while MVRV shows the embedded profit is actually less stretched than the last time prices were at similar levels — which is close to the situation described above, where the current MVRV level sits well below prior euphoric peaks despite the recent price strength.

How This Connects to the Recent ETF Flow Picture

This signal isn't arriving in isolation from the rest of the market's recent behavior. Bitcoin ETFs pulled in a sharp wave of net inflows in the days immediately following this month's Fed rate decision, reversing a stretch of outflows that had built up around the meeting itself. That capital flow data and this on-chain momentum shift are measuring different things — one tracks money entering regulated investment products, the other tracks the profit and loss embedded in on-chain holder behavior — but they're pointing in a similar direction at the same time, which is worth noting even though it doesn't make either one more predictive on its own.

When flow data and on-chain data move together like this, it at least rules out one common failure mode: a rally driven purely by a handful of large short-term traders with no real on-chain footprint. The realized cap calculation underlying MVRV reflects actual on-chain settlement, not derivatives positioning or ETF share creation alone. Seeing both data sets improve over the same stretch is a modestly more convincing setup than seeing just one of them move without the other.

Where to Check This Yourself

For anyone who wants to track this directly rather than take any single article's word for it, Glassnode publishes the MVRV Momentum Oscillator as a public chart on its Studio platform, updated regularly. It's free to view at a basic level, though deeper historical ranges and some comparison tools sit behind a subscription. Watching the raw oscillator value yourself, rather than only reading about crossovers after the fact, is the more useful habit to build if this becomes a recurring part of how you think about market cycles.

The same goes for the supporting data points mentioned here — long-term holder supply share, realized cap, the specific MVRV ratio itself. All of these are tracked continuously and update daily, which means the picture described in this piece is a snapshot, not a fixed conclusion. A useful next step for a longer-term view is simply checking back on the oscillator every few weeks rather than treating this single crossover as the end of the story.

The Resistance Zone to Watch

None of this happens in a vacuum, and the immediate price structure still matters. Bitcoin is currently testing the area between $85,000 and $87,000, a zone that's acted as resistance before. Traders are describing the current bullish mood as conditional rather than euphoric — genuine optimism, but with an explicit acknowledgment that a failure to hold support above that resistance band could open the door to consolidation or profit-taking.

That's a useful frame for reading the MVRV signal correctly. An on-chain indicator turning bullish doesn't override near-term price structure. It's a longer-horizon signal sitting on top of a market that still has to clear specific, well-known levels in the short term. Both things can be true at once: the on-chain backdrop looks constructive, and the next few thousand dollars of price action still has real resistance to work through.

What This Kind of Signal Is Good For — and What It Isn't

It's worth being direct about the limits here, because on-chain indicators get oversold online as near-certain timing tools, and they aren't that. MVRV momentum crossing its baseline is a structural, historically-grounded observation about where the market sits relative to its own recent trend. It is not a specific price target, and it doesn't come with a timeline attached. The 2019 and 2023 comparisons took real time to play out; neither was an overnight move.

What a signal like this is genuinely useful for is context. It tells you that the current recovery in Bitcoin's price isn't happening against a backdrop of stretched valuations or exhausted long-term holders — the opposite, in fact. Whether that turns into a sustained expansion phase the way 2019 and 2023 did is something only time will actually confirm. The honest way to use this data is as one input among several, not as a standalone reason to make a decision.

How to Think About This If You're Already Holding

If you're already positioned in Bitcoin, this data doesn't change what you own — it adds context to why the recent price strength might have more structural support behind it than a purely sentiment-driven bounce would. The long-term holder supply figures in particular suggest the people most likely to sell into strength haven't been doing so in large numbers yet, which is generally a supportive dynamic rather than a warning sign.

If you're on the sidelines, the more useful takeaway is probably the resistance zone rather than the on-chain data. MVRV momentum tells you about the medium-term backdrop. It says very little about whether Bitcoin clears $85,000 to $87,000 this week or next month. Those are different questions, and conflating them is one of the more common mistakes people make when a genuinely interesting on-chain signal shows up in the same week as a notable price move.

FAQ

What is Bitcoin's MVRV ratio? MVRV stands for Market Value to Realized Value. It compares Bitcoin's market cap to its realized cap — the value of each coin at the price it last moved on-chain. A reading above 1 means the average holder is in profit; below 1 means the average holder is underwater.

What does "MVRV momentum turning positive" actually mean? It refers to Glassnode's MVRV Momentum Oscillator, calculated as MVRV divided by its one-year moving average, minus one. A positive reading means MVRV is currently trading above its own annual trend — a trend signal, not a specific profit/loss threshold.

Why are the 2019 and 2023 comparisons significant? Both of those years saw the same pattern: MVRV momentum stayed depressed for an extended period, recovered toward the 1.0 baseline, and then crossed through it near the start of a broader market expansion. The current recovery follows a structurally similar path.

Does this mean Bitcoin's price is guaranteed to keep rising? No. It's a historically-grounded pattern, not a price forecast or a timeline. Bitcoin still faces a real resistance zone between $85,000 and $87,000 in the near term, and short-term momentum indicators like RSI are already in overbought territory.

What does the long-term holder data add to this picture? Long-term holders currently control around 83% of Bitcoin's supply, the highest share since late 2023. That suggests the holders most likely to sell into a downturn largely didn't during the recent pullback, which tends to support price stability on dips.

How should I actually use this information? Treat it as context for the medium-term backdrop, not a signal for exact timing. It's most useful alongside other data — price structure, resistance levels, sentiment — rather than as a standalone reason to buy or sell.

Related Articles