Why Build‑to‑Rent Communities Are Booming in Secondary Cities – Returns, Rules, and 2026 Outlook

The moment you step onto a quiet main street in a city like Des Moines, Boise, or Raleigh, you can feel a subtle shift. New brick‑and‑mortar apartments with sleek lobbies, on‑site gyms, and pet‑friendly policies are popping up where once there were only single‑family homes. It’s not a coincidence. Developers are deliberately targeting secondary cities with build‑to‑rent (BTR) projects because the math, the demographics, and the policy environment are finally aligning.

If you’ve been watching the multifamily space for a while, you probably noticed the headlines about soaring land prices in places like San Francisco or New York. Those markets are still attractive, but the barrier to entry has become so high that many investors are looking elsewhere. The secondary‑city BTR wave offers a blend of lower acquisition costs, less competition for land, and a tenant pool that’s hungry for quality rental housing. In this piece, we’ll walk through the investment returns you can expect, the regulatory hurdles that still bite, and what the market outlook looks like as we head toward 2026.

---

The Pull of Secondary Cities

Demographic drivers you can’t ignore

First, let’s talk people. The United States is still experiencing a modest but steady population shift toward the Sun Belt and the Midwest. Millennials and Gen‑Z renters are moving away from sky‑high rents in coastal metros, chasing jobs, affordability, and a better quality of life. According to the latest Census estimates, cities with populations between 100,000 and 500,000 have seen net in‑migration rates outpace many larger metros for the past three years.

What does that mean for a BTR developer? A larger pool of renters who prefer the convenience of purpose‑built apartments over older, often poorly maintained rental houses. Those renters are typically willing to pay a premium for amenities, security, and a professional management experience—exactly the value proposition BTR communities sell.

Economic fundamentals that support rent growth

Secondary cities tend to have a more diversified employment base than their larger counterparts. Think of a city like Columbus, Ohio, where finance, tech, education, and healthcare all have a sizable footprint. When a city’s economy isn’t tied to a single industry, rent growth tends to be steadier. In the Bay Area, for example, the recent tightening of new construction has forced investors to look at places like Sacramento and Fresno, where the rent‑to‑price ratio is still attractive.

Supply constraints that actually help you

You might think “more supply = lower rents,” but the reality in many secondary markets is the opposite. Zoning restrictions, slow permitting processes, and a shortage of skilled labor keep the pipeline of new multifamily units thin. The Knight Frank UK Multifamily Market Outlook 2026 flagged that high construction costs are pushing investors toward mid‑low‑rise BTR schemes—exactly the type that can be built faster and with less land.

In short, the demand side is robust, the supply side is constrained, and the economics are beginning to look like a sweet spot for investors who can navigate the local rules.

---

Investment Returns – What the Numbers Say

Cash‑flow fundamentals

When you crunch the numbers on a typical 150‑unit BTR project in a city like Boise, the first thing you’ll notice is the rent‑to‑price ratio. In 2024, the average rent for a two‑bedroom unit in Boise was about $1,250, while the average price per unit for new construction hovered around $200,000. That translates to a gross rent multiplier (GRM) of roughly 12.8, which is comfortably lower than the 15‑plus you see in many coastal markets.

Assuming a 5% vacancy rate, operating expenses of 35% of effective gross income, and a 70% loan‑to‑value (LTV) financing at a 6.5% interest rate, you’re looking at a cash‑on‑cash return in the 7‑8% range during the stabilization period. That’s before any upside from rent growth or capital appreciation.

Capital appreciation potential

Secondary cities have historically delivered higher price appreciation than the national average when they’re in the early stages of a growth cycle. The Cavan Research Build‑to‑Rent 2026 white paper highlighted the Midwest low‑density markets as the “next chapter,” noting an average annual price increase of 4.5% over the past five years. Combine that with a 3%‑4% annual rent increase, and you’re seeing an internal rate of return (IRR) that comfortably clears the 12%‑14% hurdle for many institutional investors.

Tax advantages that sweeten the deal

Don’t forget the tax side of the equation. The 1031 exchange remains a powerful tool for investors looking to defer capital gains when they sell a BTR asset. The recent Cavan white paper titled The Reluctant Landlord: Why Build‑to‑Rent Is Becoming the 1031 Exit points out that many seasoned landlords are now using BTR projects as the “next‑generation” exchange property because of the steady cash flow and lower management intensity.

Additionally, the Federal Investment Tax Credit (ITC) for energy‑efficient buildings can shave a few percentage points off the effective tax rate, especially if you incorporate solar panels or high‑performance HVAC systems.

---

Regulatory Hurdles – The Not‑So‑Pretty Part

Zoning: The first gatekeeper

Even in secondary markets, zoning can be a maze. Many cities still categorize multifamily under “high‑density” zones, which require larger minimum lot sizes, parking ratios, and setbacks. The Bay Area Multifamily Market 2026 report underscored that high land costs and zoning restrictions are choking new construction. In smaller cities, the same dynamics play out, albeit on a different scale.

A practical workaround that developers have been using is to pursue “mid‑low‑rise” zoning designations, which allow up to four stories and reduce parking requirements. This approach was highlighted in the Property Reporter piece on investors pivoting to mid‑low‑rise schemes. It’s not a silver bullet—city councils still need to approve variances, and community opposition can be fierce—but it does open a door that was previously closed.

Permitting delays and construction costs

Permitting timelines can stretch from six months to two years, depending on the municipality. The longer the delay, the higher your financing costs, and the more you risk missing a favorable market window. Some cities have introduced “fast‑track” permitting for BTR projects that meet certain affordability or sustainability criteria. It’s worth digging into local ordinances to see if those incentives apply.

Construction cost inflation remains another pain point. Steel and lumber prices have been volatile since 2022, and while they’ve started to settle, the cost premium for labor in smaller markets can still be 10‑15% higher than the national average due to limited contractor availability.

Financing quirks

Traditional lenders have been slower to adopt BTR as a distinct asset class, especially in secondary markets where the track record is shorter. That can mean higher loan‑to‑value caps, tighter debt‑service coverage ratios, or even the need for a joint‑venture equity partner. However, the rise of specialty debt funds focused on multifamily has begun to ease that pressure. By 2026, we expect a broader pool of capital willing to fund BTR projects with competitive rates, especially if the sponsor can demonstrate a solid operating history.

---

Market Outlook for 2026 – What to Expect

Demand stays resilient

Even with rising interest rates, the rental market in secondary cities remains resilient. The primary driver is affordability: as mortgage rates climb, more households choose to rent longer. A recent survey of renters in the Midwest showed that 62% plan to stay in the rental market for at least three more years, citing cost certainty and flexibility.

Interest rates and cap rates

Higher rates do put upward pressure on cap rates, but the effect is muted in markets where rent growth outpaces inflation. In 2025, the average cap rate for BTR assets in secondary cities hovered around 5.8%–6.2%, compared with 6.5%–7% for traditional multifamily. By 2026, we anticipate a modest drift to the mid‑6% range, still offering attractive yields for risk‑adjusted investors.

Supply pipeline

The pipeline is expanding, but not at a breakneck speed. According to Cavan’s Build‑to‑Rent 2026 outlook, the total planned BTR inventory in secondary markets is projected to increase by roughly 12% year‑over‑year, driven largely by mid‑low‑rise projects that can be built on smaller parcels. The key takeaway is that supply will grow, but demand is expected to keep pace, keeping vacancy rates low.

Technology and operations

Proptech is finally making its way into BTR communities outside the big metros. Automated leasing platforms, smart‑home integrations, and AI‑driven maintenance scheduling are reducing operating expenses by 5%‑8% on average. For investors, that translates into higher net operating income (NOI) and a more defensible competitive position.

---

Real‑World Examples – Lessons from the Field

1. Boise’s Riverfront BTR (150 units)

Developed in 2022, this project was built on a former industrial site and leveraged a fast‑track zoning amendment that allowed a four‑story building with a 0.5 parking ratio. The developer secured a 70% LTV loan at 5.9% interest, and the property stabilized at 96% occupancy within 12 months. By the end of 2025, rents had risen 3.8% annually, pushing the IRR to 13.5%.

Key takeaways:

• Target sites with existing infrastructure to cut soft‑costs.
• Engage early with the planning department to negotiate parking reductions.
• Use a modest equity cushion (around 30%) to maintain flexibility for refinancing.

2. Columbus, Ohio – Midtown Low‑Rise BTR (200 units)

This development used a mixed‑use approach, adding 15,000 sq ft of ground‑floor retail. The inclusion of retail qualified the project for a city‑offered tax abatement, shaving $1.2 million off the total development cost. The asset now enjoys a 7.2% cash‑on‑cash return and a projected 4.2% annual appreciation.

Key takeaways:

• Mixed‑use can unlock local incentives.
• Retail components diversify revenue streams and improve community appeal.
• Mid‑low‑rise reduces construction time, which is crucial when financing costs are high.

3. Orlando, Florida – Suburban BTR (120 units)

Orlando’s rapid population growth made it a magnet for BTR developers. The project faced a steep permitting delay due to a historic preservation review, adding six months to the timeline. However, the developer turned that setback into an opportunity by redesigning the façade to blend with the historic context, gaining community support and a faster final approval.

Key takeaways:

• Community outreach can turn opposition into advocacy.
• Flexibility in design can mitigate permitting risks.
• Suburban locations can still command premium rents when amenities are right.

---

Risk Management – How to Protect Your Investment

1. Diversify geography – Even within secondary cities, markets differ. Spread capital across at least three regions to buffer against a local economic slowdown.
2. Lock in construction contracts – Fixed‑price contracts with reputable general contractors reduce exposure to cost overruns.
3. Maintain a reserve fund – Set aside at least 5% of total development cost for unexpected permitting or compliance expenses.
4. Partner with experienced operators – A seasoned property management firm can keep operating expenses low and tenant turnover minimal.
5. Monitor policy changes – Keep an eye on local housing ordinances; a new rent‑control measure can dramatically affect cash flow.

---

Strategies for New Investors Entering the BTR Space

Start with a joint‑venture sponsor

If you’re new to multifamily, teaming up with a sponsor who has a proven BTR track record can give you access to deal flow and operational expertise. Look for sponsors that have completed at least two BTR projects in the past five years and can provide audited financials.

Focus on mid‑low‑rise assets

Given the high construction costs and permitting bottlenecks, mid‑low‑rise (three to four stories) projects strike a balance between density and cost. They also tend to be more acceptable to local communities, which can speed up approvals.

Leverage tax incentives

Many secondary cities offer tax abatements, density bonuses, or expedited permitting for projects that include a certain percentage of affordable units. Even a modest 10%‑15% reduction in property tax can boost your net return.

Use data‑driven site selection

Tools like CoStar, REIS, and local economic development reports can help you pinpoint neighborhoods where rent growth outpaces the city average. Look for indicators such as new employer announcements, school rating improvements, and infrastructure upgrades.

---

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: How does the risk profile of a BTR project in a secondary city compare to a traditional multifamily asset in a primary market? A: The risk is generally lower on the cost side—land and construction are cheaper—but higher on the regulatory side. Primary markets have more predictable zoning, whereas secondary cities may have patchwork rules that require more due diligence.

Q2: Can I finance a BTR project with a conventional bank loan, or do I need a specialty lender? A: Both options exist. Conventional banks are becoming more comfortable with BTR, especially if the sponsor has a solid operating history. Specialty lenders often offer faster approvals and more flexible terms, which can be useful when you’re racing against a permitting deadline.

Q3: What cap rates should I target for a BTR asset in a secondary city in 2026? A: Expect cap rates to settle in the 5.8%–6.5% range, depending on the city’s growth trajectory and the asset’s quality. Higher‑quality, amenity‑rich projects can command the lower end of that range.

Q4: Are there any specific tax benefits unique to BTR investments? A: Yes. Apart from the standard 1031 exchange, many states offer accelerated depreciation schedules for multifamily assets, and some municipalities provide tax abatements for projects that meet affordability or sustainability criteria.

Q5: How important is the rent‑to‑price ratio when evaluating a BTR opportunity? A: It’s a critical first filter. A lower rent‑to‑price ratio indicates that the asset can generate cash flow more quickly, which is essential for covering debt service and achieving target returns.

Q6: Will rising interest rates kill the BTR market in secondary cities? A: Not likely. While higher rates increase financing costs, the rental demand in these markets remains strong because many households are choosing to rent longer rather than stretch to afford a mortgage. The key is to lock in favorable rates early and structure the capital stack to mitigate rate risk.

---

Final Thoughts

The rise of build‑to‑rent communities in secondary cities isn’t a passing fad; it’s a structural shift driven by demographic trends, economic diversification, and a tightening supply pipeline in the larger metros. For investors who can navigate zoning quirks, manage construction risk, and partner with operators who understand the tenant experience, the upside is compelling.

Looking ahead to 2026, the market appears poised to deliver stable cash flow, respectable appreciation, and a suite of tax advantages that keep the after‑tax return attractive. As always, the devil is in the details—do your homework on local regulations, keep an eye on financing costs, and stay flexible in your development approach.

If you’re ready to explore a BTR opportunity, start by mapping out the secondary cities that align with your risk tolerance and capital capacity. The next wave of high‑quality rental communities is already under construction; the question is whether you’ll be part of it.